Americans will “fall back” for the 101st time within the predawn darkish of Sunday morning, formally ending this yr’s iteration of daylight saving time – the controversial follow first applied within the United States in 1918 to assist save on the price of gasoline.

To be exact, not everybody may have the posh of an additional hour of sleep. Residents of each Hawaii and Arizona don’t follow DST in any respect. But these of us residing within the different 48 states and Washington, D.C., will benefit from the annual deal with of a 49-hour weekend.

Unlike many critics of the coverage, I don’t have any drawback with the follow. In reality, I sort of prefer it.


Looking again, I’ve at all times loved the anticipation of the time change. That might sound foolish to some, however our mom made a behavior of reminding us of the facility of optimistic expectations, encouraging us to favorably anticipate even incidental and seemingly small issues like “falling back” and “springing ahead”

Her philosophy jogs my memory of a favourite line from the traditional novel, “Anne of Green Gables.” Speaking along with her pal Marilla, Anne properly observes, “Looking forward to things is half the pleasure of them.”

There are a whole lot of issues to love about the present set-up. In the case of alternating between DST and normal time, you get an additional hour of sleep on a Saturday night time within the fall – and extra daylight on spring and summer time evenings.  From my standpoint, it additionally serves as one thing of a symbolic marker of the altering seasons.

Here we’re arguing about dropping and gaining an hour – however wouldn’t we be higher off pondering how we spend our time total?

Opponents of DST cite a laundry checklist of causes for his or her agitation surrounding the biannual change, from suggesting the follow results in sleep sample disturbances, even citing analysis that purportedly suggests altering the time twice a yr will increase the chance of coronary heart assaults, melancholy and suicide.

Rare exceptions however, opposition to the custom appear overwrought for one essential motive:

We’re speaking about one hour.

Three thousand 600 seconds.

I suspect many who lament the lack of an hour within the spring don’t have any drawback staying out late for live shows or different blissful events. Likewise, few appear to have their circadian rhythms upended by sleeping in for an additional hour from time to time.

And what about these of us who recurrently journey between time zones? I’ve by no means heard of anybody who flies between only one zone complain of jet lag. Three or 4, perhaps. But not one.

It’s simply not that large of a deal, particularly in the long term.

To be truthful, DST has loved an uneven historical past, a undeniable fact that in all probability contributes to its controversial fame.

Dating again to World War I, the legislation first ordering the custom was so unpopular it was repealed nationwide in 1919 however retained in a number of main U.S. cities, together with New York.

Between 1942 and 1945, President Franklin Roosevelt instituted the follow year-round, calling it “War Time” – all with the intent of saving funds and conserving sources for the conflict by maximizing the out there daylight.

Citizens sufficiently old to recollect will recall there have been quite a few changes to the century-old follow. Over the years the beginning and finish dates have modified, most not too long ago in 2007 when lawmakers prolonged DST, transferring from April to March and October to November.

The biannual imbroglio brings to thoughts the previous story of the Greek thinker Demosthenes who was as soon as instructing a listless crowd about issues of life and loss of life.

The instructor started telling of a person who rented a donkey to hold sticks over a mountain. Halfway by way of the recent and sunny journey, the person stopped for a break and sat within the shade of the animal. The proprietor of the burro joined him however quickly found there wasn’t room for each males.

An argument ensued because the proprietor of the animal contended he rented out the donkey – not the donkey’s shade.

The Greek tutorial then walked off the stage and the once-listless crowd all of a sudden grew stressed and agitated, yelling out and desirous to know who in the end owned the shade.

Demosthenes returned. “You didn’t seem to care about matters of life and death,” he chided them. “But you care about the trivial like the shade of a donkey!”


I typically surprise if we’re responsible of the identical factor, particularly in relation to the talk about daylight saving time. Here we’re arguing about dropping and gaining an hour – however wouldn’t we be higher off pondering how we spend our time total?

Time is a finite useful resource. While all of us have the identical quantity in a day, not everybody will get pleasure from the identical quantity of days of their lives.

More from Opinion

“Time is what we want most, but what we use worst,” wrote William Penn over 300 years in the past – a reminder that occasions change however human nature doesn’t.

Instead of arguing about the hour – how about being grateful now we have any time in any respect?


So no matter the place you might be on the spectrum of the DST debate, the phrases of the Roman poet Horace – contemporized over 2,000 years later by the late Robin Williams within the traditional, “Dead Poet’s Society” nonetheless ring true:

Carpe diem.


No Comments
Comments to: Paul Batura: Daylight saving time frenzy – What’s so bad about ‘falling back,’ America?