Trains carrying hazardous items throughout the nation will probably be slowing down over the subsequent 30 days, following the second fiery crash in a two-month span close to Guernsey, Sask. 

While it is a transfer towards safer rail transport, the choice to sluggish trains down could have impacts throughout the nation, consultants say.

Garland Chow, an affiliate professor emeritus at UBC Sauder School of Business, mentioned there are a selection of security advantages for trains.

“When you’re going slower, you can stop faster. So if the problem is an obstruction on the tracks at a weird crossing or something like that, they can stop faster and minimize the impact, if not avoid it,” he mentioned. 

“The second benefit of having slower speeds is that after a collision, the impact will be less. But perhaps the most important one is that … if there is a derailment at a slower speed, fewer cars may derail.”

However, he mentioned slower trains do create potential for accidents, as sooner trains have to decelerate once they strategy a slower shifting practice. 

Chow mentioned there should be extra diligence in the case of trains passing one another in order to stop accidents from taking place.

Slowdown could have a ripple impact

Chow mentioned the largest impression on the economic system will probably be on productiveness. 

He mentioned railroads operators search to make use of as a lot of their gear as they’ll in any given time frame for the longest distance.

WATCH |  Garneau is ordering slower speeds for trains carrying harmful items

Federal Transport Minister Marc Garneau is ordering slower speeds for trains carrying harmful items on federal traces in the wake of a derailment in Saskatchewan on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2020. 4:53

“The slower you go, the less capacity that you have and the less you’re utilizing a given locomotive and its cars,” he mentioned.

He added that whereas the slowdown solely impacts trains carrying hazardous items, it can primarily create a ripple impact that will probably be felt throughout all the rail system. 

“The scheduling they optimized is now going to be impacted so that these very precise movements of the trains, which optimized utilization of the track, that original plan has now been messed up,” he mentioned. 

Chow mentioned crew scheduling can be probably going to be affected as trains is not going to be making it from level A to level B on the similar instances they used to, so crews will probably be rescheduled, added or practice stops should be co-ordinated in a different way.

Half the pace, twice as lengthy to succeed in market

With trains travelling slower, items will take longer to succeed in market, based on Ian Naish, who owns a transportation security session firm and is the previous director of rail and pipeline investigations on the Transportation Safety Board of Canada. 

“It’s four times as safe, going at half the speed,” Naish mentioned. “If you talk about the economics issues, the fact that it’s going half as fast means that you can’t get the product to market; it gets there twice as slowly.” 

Naish mentioned the tanker vehicles can survive crashes at half the pace a lot better than they’ll when travelling at full speeds. 

He speculated that monitor circumstances, the historical past of that stretch of tracks and the route’s site visitors would be the topics of a Transportation Safety Board investigation into the latest derailment and subsequent fireplace. 

“There’s quite a large increase in fires and explosions in the last year over previous years,” Naish mentioned. “I don’t know how they define those, but it’s one thing I look at.” 

Alternative choices slim

Barry Prentice, professor of provide chain administration on the University of Manitoba, mentioned there aren’t many choices other than shifting hazardous items by rail. 

“Imagine moving all these products by truck. There’d be a lot more risk in doing that,” he mentioned. 

“The alternative would be pipelines and they are safer, but there’s a lot of resistance to building pipelines. We don’t have many choices except rail.” 

Prentice mentioned the complete impression will rely on how lengthy the slowdown order lasts. 

Because that is only a restricted time slowdown, as soon as the chilly interval is over he expects to see issues return again to regular sooner slightly than later, he mentioned. 

Impact on oil, fuel shipments unclear

John Zahary, CEO of Altex Energy, mentioned his firm oversees the loading and unloading of merchandise off of trains. 

He mentioned a bulk of the corporate’s work comes from crude oil shipments, and estimated that a couple of quarter of all of the oil that will get loaded onto rail vehicles in Western Canada goes via Altex. 

Zahary mentioned the slowdown was not surprising, however he wasn’t positive as to what the impact of the order will probably be for his firm fairly but. 

“We don’t know, and our customers — producers [and] refiners — don’t know either. We’re gonna have to see how this situation evolves,” Zahary mentioned, including there is a heightened diploma of tension in the trade. 

“It has been tough for most oil companies to be successful in Western Canada in the last number of years and you can only take so many body blows without succumbing to the impact of this stuff.”

No Comments
Comments to: Experts weigh in on rail slowdown imposed following fiery crash in Sask.