Of all of the dumb stuff a few of us are responsible of indulging in throughout the present pandemic, downplaying its severity is actually widespread. We’ve seen Sean Hannity do it. We’ve seen Elon Musk do it. And whereas a ton of us have in all probability seen Dr. Drew do it—because of a supercut of the media mogul that went viral over the weekend—he appears to be the one considered one of these media moguls that’s hell-bent on erasing any proof that he ever downplayed the pandemic within the first place.
In a now-deleted tweet thread, the physician claimed the reduce of clips taken from February and March of this 12 months infringed “copywrite[sp] laws,” telling one one who uploaded the reduce to “hang onto your retweets,” or “erase [the post] to be safe.”
While a minimum of one copy of the preliminary video remains to be circulating round on YouTube because of a person calling himself “Dr. Droops,” it appears to be like like the unique model was ripped from the video-sharing web site—not by the creator, however by Dr. Drew himself. Anyone who tries visiting the unique URL that housed the video will discover that the preliminary creator was smacked with a copyright declare from Dr. Drew’s personal manufacturing firm: Drew Pinsky Inc.
This copyright strike—which we’ve screengrabbed in all of its faux-legal glory—is simply the most recent instance of The Streisand Effect: the time period coined again within the early aughts to consult with anybody’s makes an attempt to censor intel about themselves on-line, solely to convey their screwups to harsher mild within the course of. After all, neither I nor my pals watch a lot Dr. Drew, so the clip—through which he significantly downplays the seriousness of a pandemic that’s claimed roughly 10,000 lives within the US alone—initially prevented my line of sight. But when he began invoking YouTube’s notoriously shitty copyright insurance policies to cowl it up, instantly I’m very, very .
Even if Drew needs that it was, the unique supercut—the place he calls the Coronavirus “way less virulent than the flu,” insists that headlines must be branding it “way less serious than influenza,” and jokes in regards to the thought of probably shutting down the Olympics—isn’t illegal within the slightest. While the clips themselves have been posted with out his say-so, the content material of the clips fall squarely within the realm of criticism and within the public’s curiosity, making the supercut itself fall squarely throughout the realm of fair use. And as Techdirt points out in their own coverage, the courts have been telling plaintiffs for nearly half a decade that they need to be mindful of fair use before sending down a takedown, following the Lenz v. Universal Music case of 2015.
Just to be totally clear, seeing Dr. Drew irresponsibly downplaying the threat of the coronavirus is in the public interest because he’s a TV doctor and many people take what he says seriously. The reality is that Drew specializes in addiction, he’s not an epidemiologist, and your life would be no worse if you ignored his existence entirely.
It’s worth noting that around the same time that these strikes—and Twitter threats—were sent out, Drew took to Twitter himself to confess that he was mistaken in his preliminary stance on COVID-19. “My intention was to lessen the panic that I could see coming,” Drew defined over a video stream he’d revealed to Twitter on Saturday evening. “I was trying to get people to measure their emotional response to the other numbers we were seeing,” he added, evaluating it to the greater than 60 million circumstances of H1N1 roughly a decade in the past, to not point out the thousands and thousands of flu circumstances reported by the CDC this 12 months. Strangely absent from any of those apologies is any point out of his makes an attempt to quash the clips that began this dialog within the first place. But you’ll be able to discover all of the clips you want on YouTube to make your personal supercut of Dr. Drew getting means out of his lane.