At the age of 96, the keeper of religion within the apostrophe has admitted defeat to public apathy. John Richards of the UK, who based the Apostrophe Protection Society in 2001, has bowed to the superior pressure of “ignorance and laziness”. Never thoughts they obtained off to a great begin, profitable the Ig Nobel for “efforts to protect, promote and defend the differences between plural and possessive”. And they’ve proven extra stamina than the motion to place the ‘e’ again in ‘judgment’. More’s the pity. Mores the pity? Why not, it appears neater.
Fooling with the apostrophe, which has ruled possessives like ‘Waterstone’s’ and contractions and elisions like ‘mustn’t’ since 1496, is typically deliberate. The bookseller Waterstone’s turned Waterstones as a result of in response to the grammar of design (sure, such a factor exists, and it’s fairly implacable in motion), store indicators and logos look nicer with out that fiddly little character rearing up off the baseline. Harrods and Selfridges, too, have dropped it. And usually talking, the English are deplorably susceptible to misplace their apostrophes in place names involving saints — St Johns, St Annes and so forth.
Besides, the march of know-how leaves ignorance and laziness consuming mud. Consider the dreadful pidgin incubated by Twitter’s restrictions on the size of a message. F u cn gt away wid dis, you’d ruthlessly shoulder apostrophes apart. A few years in the past, there was widespread outrage when Tim Berners-Lee, father of the World Wide Web, admitted that the second ahead slash in http:// was redundant. Millions complained about unnecessary injury to their carpal tunnels. Now that Richards’ society has closed down, thousands and thousands extra could gaze irritably on the apostrophe key. Wouldnt you?